When the first tee shots were struck at Black Diamond Ranch’s Ranch Course in Lecanto, Florida, the LIV Golf Promotions event felt less like a tournament and more like an examination. Nearly 90 players arrived with different résumés, different motivations, and wildly different career arcs, but all were chasing the same outcome: one of three LIV Golf League cards for 2026.
Unlike a traditional tour event, Promotions strips golf down to its harshest reality. There are no safety nets, no season-long cushions, and no exemptions to lean on. After two rounds, the majority of the field is gone. Then, just when players think they have established position, scores are reset, and the final 36 holes become a standalone test of execution under maximum pressure.
By Sunday afternoon, the math was complete. Richard T. Lee, Bjorn Hellgren, and Anthony Kim emerged from the chaos — not because they played the same way, but because each found a statistical formula that survived when everything tightened.
This was not a qualifier won by highlights.
It was won by averages that held up when elimination was permanent.
The Setting: A Course That Punishes Extremes
Black Diamond Ranch’s Ranch Course quietly dictated the outcome long before the leaderboard took shape. While not long by modern standards, the course’s elevation changes, angled greens, and demanding par-4s forced players into repeated mid-iron approaches — the exact area where separation occurs.
The scoring data reflected this immediately. Players who relied heavily on power without positional control struggled to sustain birdie looks. Conversely, those who consistently hit fairways and controlled spin into firm greens created repeatable scoring chances. Over the week, the leaderboard correlated far more strongly with approach proximity and bogey avoidance than raw distance.
That reality framed how the three eventual qualifiers succeeded — each in a different way.
Richard T. Lee: Winning Through Compression and Control
Richard T. Lee didn’t dominate Promotions by overwhelming the course.
He dominated it by removing volatility.
Across four rounds of 64, 66, 64, and 65, Lee finished 11-under par, five shots clear of second place. What made the margin striking was not how many birdies he made, but how rarely he gave anything back. Over the course of the week, his scoring profile showed one of the lowest bogey rates in the field, paired with a steady birdie average hovering near five per round.
Lee’s advantage began off the tee. While not among the longest players, he consistently placed the ball in preferred positions, which showed up in his approach numbers. From the critical 150–200-yard range — where the Ranch Course asks the most questions — Lee repeatedly hit the center sections of greens, shrinking variance and forcing stress-free putts.
As pressure increased in the final 36 holes, his scoring average didn’t dip. If anything, it stabilized. While others chased birdies and flirted with mistakes, Lee continued to average under par on par-4s — the most predictive scoring category on the course.
This is how separation happened. Not through surges, but through statistical compression. Every hole Lee played reduced the number of ways the field could catch him.
By the time the final stretch arrived Sunday, the tournament was no longer about chasing Lee.
It was about who could survive behind him.
Bjorn Hellgren: Turning Volatility Into an Asset
Bjorn Hellgren’s qualification tells a different story — one built not on minimizing variance, but on deploying it strategically.
Hellgren entered the final round with work to do, then produced the lowest round of the tournament: a 6-under-par 64 that featured eight birdies. His scoring spike didn’t come from suddenly hitting the ball better tee to green than everyone else. It came from conversion efficiency.
Where others missed inside 20 feet, Hellgren made them. Where the field averaged cautious par-5 scoring, he attacked and cashed in. His birdie-to-bogey ratio in the final round was among the best of the week, allowing him to climb while others stalled.
Statistically, Hellgren’s week was defined by timing. His scoring average improved as the pressure increased — a rare and valuable trait in a cut-reset format. Instead of protecting position, he leaned into scoring holes, knowing that Promotions rewards upward movement more than conservative stability.
This approach carries risk, and throughout the week, Hellgren absorbed a few bogeys. But unlike players who mixed mistakes with missed opportunities, Hellgren offset errors with immediate red numbers. Over the final 18 holes, that balance tipped decisively in his favor.
Hellgren didn’t qualify by being the most consistent player.
He qualified by being the most dangerous scorer when opportunity appeared.
Anthony Kim: Survival Golf Executed at the Right Moments
Anthony Kim’s return to LIV Golf was not built on overwhelming statistics.
It was built on precision at leverage points.
Kim nearly exited Promotions before the final phase, requiring a birdie on the final hole of Round 2 just to advance. From that moment on, his performance shifted into a mode defined by restraint, discipline, and execution under threat.
Over the final 36 holes, Kim finished 5-under par, enough to secure the final LIV card. While his birdie totals trailed Lee and Hellgren, his bogey avoidance improved noticeably as the week progressed. His scrambling numbers were among the most effective in the final group, allowing him to neutralize misses that would have otherwise derailed momentum.
Kim’s statistical edge wasn’t dominance — it was damage control. His approach play consistently left putts from manageable ranges, and when greens were missed, his short game stabilized rounds that could have unraveled quickly.
In a format where scores reset and pressure multiplies, Kim’s experience showed up in how he managed expectation. He didn’t chase positions unnecessarily. He let others eliminate themselves.
This is the kind of performance that doesn’t jump off a leaderboard, but survives it.
Kim didn’t need to be spectacular.
He needed to be precise when elimination was one shot away.
If you find this analysis useful, receive a new one every week directly in your inbox
Why These Three Advanced — And the Field Did Not
The LIV Golf Promotions format exposes one truth relentlessly: only repeatable scoring behaviors survive resets.
Lee advanced because his tee-to-green averages produced a scoring floor the field couldn’t reach. Hellgren advanced because his birdie conversion spiked when it mattered most. Kim advanced because his mistake rate dropped exactly when mistakes became fatal.
Different profiles.
Same test.
Same reward.
What separated the qualifiers wasn’t talent alone — it was how each player’s statistical strengths aligned with the course, the format, and the moment.
Conclusion: A Week Where the Numbers Were the Narrative
LIV Golf Promotions 2026 wasn’t decided by reputation, highlight shots, or momentum swings. It was decided by what players averaged when the reset erased comfort and the pressure exposed tendencies.
Richard T. Lee averaged control.
Bjorn Hellgren averaged conversion.
Anthony Kim averaged survival.
Three LIV cards were awarded not to the loudest performances, but to the most resilient statistical profiles.
One tournament.
Three distinct blueprints.
And a reminder that in modern professional golf, careers are often decided not by moments — but by what holds up over 36 holes when nothing can be reset again.
Latest Posts
Source: Getty Images